← Back to Blog
Project Deep-DiveAI agentsWeb3Azure

Inside agenticai01.tech: Building an Agent OS for the Web3 Era

agenticai01.tech is a marketplace and OS for AI agents — developers publish them, users deploy them. Here is the architecture behind a multi-subdomain AI platform.

SPSantosh Paudel· June 7, 2026· 8 min read· 3 views
Table of contents

The idea behind agenticai01.tech is straightforward but technically demanding: a platform where AI agents are first-class citizens.

Developers build and publish agents. Users discover, evaluate, and deploy them — the way you would install an app, but the output is autonomous work rather than a GUI to click through. Agents can, in the roadmap, purchase other agents as tools. The platform is the operating system.

The Web3 angle is deliberate: agents that transact, agents that hold balances, agents that own assets. The infrastructure needs to support this from day one, not as an afterthought.

Here is what is built, what the architecture looks like, and where the complexity lives.

The Multi-Subdomain Architecture

agenticai01.tech uses three subdomains with different infrastructure stacks:

agenticai01.tech (root) — The marketing and discovery layer. Static Next.js deployment on Vercel. Fast, public, no auth required for browsing.

app.agenticai01.tech — The application layer. Next.js with Supabase auth, dynamic routes for agent detail pages, the developer publishing flow, and the user deployment interface. Also on Vercel, separate project from the root.

api.agenticai01.tech — The API and execution layer. Azure Functions. This is where agent runs are executed, where webhook events are processed, and where the payment layer sits. Azure because the execution model (long-running functions, specific runtime requirements) fits Azure Functions better than Vercel's edge model.

The separation matters because the concerns are genuinely different. The marketing surface needs CDN-level performance. The application needs Supabase RLS and dynamic data. The API layer needs execution isolation and longer timeouts than edge functions allow.

The Database

The database is on Azure — specifically Azure Database for PostgreSQL. Not Supabase. The decision: the payment and agent execution data has compliance requirements that made a dedicated managed PostgreSQL instance preferable to a shared Supabase project.

The application layer (app.agenticai01.tech) connects to this Azure PostgreSQL instance via connection pooling. The API layer writes to it directly. The schema is standard PostgreSQL — no Supabase-specific extensions needed.

The Agent Data Model

An agent in the system is a record with:

  • Metadata (name, description, version, author)
  • Capabilities (a structured list of what the agent can do)
  • Pricing (per-run cost, subscription options)
  • Runtime config (model, max tokens, timeout)
  • Tool list (what external APIs it can call)

An agent run is a separate record linked to the agent and the user. Runs have status (queued, running, completed, failed), input, output, token usage, and cost.

This separation — agents as templates, runs as instances — is the core architectural pattern.

The SaaS Deployment Layer

Developers publish agents through a multi-step flow:

  1. Upload agent config (JSON)
  2. Provide a system prompt and capability list
  3. Set pricing
  4. Submit for review

Review is manual right now. As the platform scales, automated review (safety checks, capability validation) will replace the manual step.

Users deploy agents with one click. "Deploy" means: create a run, pass the user's input, return the output. For recurring agents, deploy creates a scheduled job.

Where the Complexity Lives

The hardest problem is not infrastructure — it is trust. When a user deploys an agent, they are trusting the platform (and the developer) with their data and their budget. The platform needs to isolate agent runs so one agent cannot affect another, enforce spending limits before runs execute, and provide transparent logging of what the agent did.

All of these are solved in the current build. They are not hard in isolation. The complexity is that they all need to work together correctly.


Resources


Building an AI platform or marketplace? I take on complex multi-layer architectures across Azure, Vercel, and Supabase. See my work or get in touch.

Get the free AI Prompt Pack + weekly frameworks

30+ tested prompts for images, captions, scripts & keywords, delivered instantly. Plus real insights on AI + marketing — no generic tips.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Want to implement this with guidance?

Santosh helps founders turn insights like this into real systems.

AI Content Systems

External Resources

Further Reading & Tools

Related Posts

01
2 min
Next.jsSupabase
6d agoProgrammatic SEO

The Engine Room: Architecting a 200+ Page Programmatic Content System on Next.js 15 & Supabase

Managing a handful of blogs is easy. Scaling to 200+ high-quality, vertical-specific content assets is an engineering challenge. Here is the exact programmatic database schema, static generation routing, and automated pipeline behind a high-velocity content engine.

Read article
02
9 min
Next.jsSupabase
20d agoDev Sprint

How I Shipped 4 Full-Stack Platforms in 25 Days

Four production-ready sites. One developer. Twenty-five days. Here is the exact stack, timeline, and workflow — including what broke and what made it possible.

Read article
03
8 min
portfolioadmin panel
23d agoProject Deep-Dive

Case Study: santoshpaudel.me — A Portfolio That Runs Like a Business

Most developer portfolios are digital brochures. Mine has a CRM, lead management, AI content agents, and a full admin panel. Here is what I built and why.

Read article